-
Be careful on BusinessWeek.com.
-
Interesting discussion of how to get children to eat healthy: keep them in the kitchen, don’t diet in front of them, avoid “forbidden fruit.”
-
Just out of curiosity, how DOES an ACC team like Virginia get beaten like an old carpet by Connecticut?
-
New Obama ad using press coverage of McCain’s dishonest campaign against him.
-
Hmm, a ratings system for web applications! What a great idea!! Seriously, with a market like Facebook’s, a reputation system is a really critical thing to get in place.
-
As usual, trenchant observation from Gruber: “Perhaps this will refocus presidential campaign coverage on the economy rather than bullshit.”
-
Oh crap.
-
Man, the Japanese cellphone market is weird.
-
A surprisingly concise and cogent peom by Bob Dylan in th!s week’s New Yorker.
-
Katie Couric starts to get some respect, and got a killer quote from Mike Dukakis, of all people: “Look, I owe the American people an apology. If I had beaten the old man, you would never have heard of the kid and then we wouldn’t be in this mess.”
-
“Epic fail,” indeed.
-
The first official release of the Common Weakness Enumeration, a standard way of classifying and describing software flaws that may lead to security vulnerabilities.
Day: September 15, 2008
Meta campaigning: what to do when the other guy won’t talk straight
American representative democracy is based on some non-intuitive principles–that we the people should care enough about how we are governed that we develop an informed opinion on it, that power is best when dispersed and checked–and on some non-obvious assumptions. The one assumption that is absolutely key is that the people will have access to enough information on the candidates to make an informed decision.
This election is testing that assumption. With one side, we had a bitterly fought primary that lasted almost eighteen months and went right down to the wire, a candidate who has written two books and multiple detailed position papers about his views and policy proposals, who has said all along that he wanted to get above politics as usual to address core issues. On the other side, we have a ticket that has played fast and loose with the truth about themselves, particularly about Palin, and about their opponent. In this environment, there’s information asymmetry and the voter loses.
So how do you get back to the point where a balanced and fair exchange of views is possible? Well, maybe you run an ad that calls the other candidate on the lies he’s been telling, and you do it by summing up all the independent press coverage across the political spectrum that’s been written about it. An ad something like this:
Will it move the base, who are hoping against hope that McCain and Palin, against all odds, will actually embody the small government principles they want to see in Washington? I don’t know. I just hope it moves some independent voters. But I’m happy to see the campaign going on the attack about this.