I swear I’ll stop writing about the site soon, but right now the visual aspects are kind of front and center in my mind. Today’s theme is called Cutline, and it’s by Chris Pearson. It’s a very popular theme, currently number one at the WordPress themes site.
Things I like about it:
- Appearance: crisp, graphically well laid out, doesn’t use the Microsoft sans serifs (though I’m not crazy about Arial/Helvetica as they ship, and will probably make some tweaks here).
- Post layout: brings the interaction element right up top.
- Easy to manage.
- The headline image has interesting placement, the author has provided an easy way to randomize the headers, and the non-obvious image dimensions have made me think about how to pull details out of larger photos.
Things I don’t like:
- The typographic color is all off. The posts disappear in the middle of the page because the sidebars are so dark. Partly this is because of…
- The heavy use of horizontal rules as separators. The dark lines pull my eyes all over the place. And the bold Helvetica/Arial for the headline type in the sidebar is overkill.
- The title region plus the header image pushes the site pretty far down the page.
- Not liquid layout. I appreciate the fact that I don’t have to cram everything into one sidebar, but it makes the page harder to work from an information perspective, and it limits the resizing I can do. Plus the sidebars are sized in pixels, so that limits the amount of text resizing I can do.
I can fix #1 and 2, and have some ideas about #3, but #4 is something I’d rather not try to fix myself. I’ll have to see how other themes handle this issue.
Anyone have strong thoughts about this theme?
From Pearson, this is easier on the eyes:
http://pearsonified.com/theme/neoclassical/
And this ain’t bad:
http://diythemes.com/thesis/
… but I prefer a theme he didn’t update for WP 2.5, named Pressrow. You can see it in action here:
http://jameskotecki.com/
You needn’t stop writing about the site. Those of us with less awareness and knowledge of things typographic, fontographic, and layoutographic are enjoying your musings.